Posts Tagged bountyup
Apparently I Have a Website for Jumping on People
Posted by admin in entrepreneurs on 21Jul08
First major coverage of BountyUp.com by traditional media – my hometown “Times Colonist” finally ran a piece, titled “Online venture gaining steam“. While complementary (especially the wickedly-good photo), it ran a little short on accuracy – apparently I’ve got a “crowd-surfing” website.
However, after three turbulent years, McKenty’s website is starting to garner international attention. Created in 2005, Bountyup.com has received millions of donations to fund projects for Oak Bay science students, North Carolina choirs and Middle East social activists.
Trust me – if I had received “Millions of donations”, I wouldn’t still be freelancing for NASA. I believe the word I used was “dozens”. Ah well.
Oh, and I never got paid for being in the circus. My first paying job was shoveling horse manure, several years later.
Still, the coverage (plus the recent coverage of the Oak Bay High School Bounty) has been enough to get me excited about the project again – even after Microsoft launched their competitor. I’m toying with the idea of using 99designs.com for a face-lift, but what I really need is some improvements in usability. What are YOUR favorite contest sites?
Talking about Collaboration over at OpenInnovators.net
Posted by admin in entrepreneurs on 25Feb08
I’ve started blogging over at OpenInnovators.net today, kicking off a discussion about collaboration within collaboration companies. Here is an excerpt:
This last weekend, at the Northern Voice conference in Vancouver, I had the pleasure of spending a few minutes talking about collaboration and crowdsourcing with the great folks at GiveMeaning. I had a similar discussion with Jaison Morgan, of the X-Prize Foundation, in Santa Monica last fall. But sadly, these sorts of meetings seem to be few and far between.
By my last count, there are a few dozen web portals dedicated to crowd-sourcing, on the spectrum from ideation, through charity and into straight-up commerce and procurement. I should know – I run one of them. And yet, in a field defined by cooperation over competition, and the wisdom of the crowd over the supremacy of the individual, there is a noticeable
glaringlack of communication between these companies.
To see what conclusions I draw from this, as well as the new cross-media tags I’m proposing, you can read the rest of the article here.
And, if you have ideas of things you’d like to see me blog about, (at OpenInnovators.net, on the BountyUp blog, or here) – please let me know.
Raising Money – The Second Time
Posted by admin in entrepreneurs on 22Jan08
“Going for broke.”
When it comes to entrepreneurship, there are several truisms that immediately jump out at you -
- Most (almost all) entrepreneurs fail the first time.
- Many of them fail the second or third time as well.
- The winners are the ones who kept going.
Coupled with the fact that almost all businesses, large or small, start out with capital raised from friends and family, and you end up with an interesting dilemma – how do you raise money the second time?
I can answer this from a couple of perspectives, the first being my own. Depending on how you count things, this is probably my third startup. The first, known only by the quizzical nomenclature of 6169171, was an amazing flameout. The second, NaTel Communications, Inc., I’m in the middle of selling off – for something very close to liquidation value.
At the height of our hubris in the 616 days, we raised $120K in a little less than 6 weeks. Couple that with in-house money (about $50K), and three of us working largely unpaid for almost a year, and the total business loss was easily $250K – which I gather is typical of a tech-company flameout.
What happened?
Pretty much everything you can imagine.
- Our financial consultant turned out to be wanted by the FBI for fraud.
- Our first major partners ended up disclosing (after signing a contract, mind you) that they were already in partnership with LG Electronics, and wouldn’t break the contract unless we provided them with $60K per month in operating capital. We didn’t even have the budget to sue them.
- Our CFO ran off with our business plan and second major partnership, and set up a directly competing business.
- Our accountant, although brilliant, disappeared for months at a time, and never finished the asset restatement. (Mind you, we never got a bill, either).
The final nail in the coffin was when our primary competitor filed something very close to a carbon copy of our financing application, and received several million dollars in government-backed loans – which disqualified our application before it was even submitted.Backing up from the specifics, though – what went wrong?
- The deal was too big. Three-corner deals can be amazingly powerful, but expect 6-12 months to close them, and a failure rate 3 times normal.
- The initial financing was too small. We ran out of money every 60 days, and had to stop work while we raised more. Since we never raised enough, each cycle got harder to close, as investor confidence fell.
- We didn’t have the right team – it was geographically distributed, and we didn’t know each other well enough going in.
When I moved past this project, and started trying to move NaTel Communications, Inc. forward, I took a slightly different approach – I brought in a single “business partner”, who brought both money, and active participation. (While we tried to do that with 616, the partner we brought in there turned out to have neither money, or skills.)
There are problems with this approach – most of them revolve around the friction developed in a business environment where one of several “equal” partners has the final word on how every dollar gets spent. Opportunity cost is a bitch.
So what now?
Now I’m back at a startup with a way more exciting opportunity, and some major differences:
- BountyUp.com already has revenue (albeit small).
- It’s growing, and doesn’t need $billions to do so.
- I’m working on a project that I’m excited about.
- Outside of the business idea, we’re not getting creative – all the fundamentals (business model, financing, technology) are proven, long-term, industry standards.
Is this enough to convince would-be friends-and-family-investors to take a second chance, or will the adage of “Once burned, twice shy” hold true? I’ll let you know in a few weeks.
Some other things I’ve done:
- Paid it back. To date, I’ve paid back close to $20K of the initial outside investments into 616. While a long way from the total amount, I’ve made sure to pay back those who could least afford to lose it, first. (And yes, that’s out of my own pocket.)
- Told the truth. (Even about the embarrassing things, like getting suckered by a Florida financing con-man).
- Put more of my own “skin in the game”. Last time round, I was nearly flat broke myself, and tried to make up for my small financial contribution by working, literally, 16-20 hours a day. For a YEAR. In retrospect, this was bad for the business, and led to other mistakes, which compounded themselves.
- Focused on the product first, and the financing second.
Now it’s your turn to tell your story – what did you do to raise money? What did you do when you failed? Who came back for a second try?
Inconvenience – Life Racing to Zero Impact
The Concept:

Take the basic ideas (problem description) from “An Inconvenient Truth”.
Create a regional contest (bounty) for teams with the lowest global impact (average per person on the team) over 6 months. Global Impact is measured and documented as:
- Carbon output
- Non-renewables consumed
- Average distance food travels (aka carbon output in transport)
- Social impact (Average wage in USD of all workers in the supply chain of all goods and services consumed)
Obviously need a good baseline and some rough approximations.
Contests are regional in scope (e.g., Inconvenience Vancouver Island, Inconvenience Chicago, etc).
Teams can seek local or international corporate sponsors as appropriate to their plan (BC Hydro for a team looking mostly at electrical reduction, etc.)
Teams are responsible for documenting their score (photographic evidence of bicycle transport, power bills, etc.)
Make a reality TV show around it.
Host a massive awards ceremony with Celebrity MCs.
Kick it off with a rock concert, bring the teams up on stage in between acts.
If we can figure out a way to generate a handicap for each region (based on climate, available options, etc.) then we could play regional champions against each other.
THE NAME:
Obviously a not-subtle reference to the film, it also highlights that it is, at most, an “Inconvenience” to change your lifestyle to save the planet, and by extension, humanity.
It’s verbable.
It can be abbreviated to iCon, which also has interesting connotations as being a symbol of something bigger.
The domain name is parked and possibly for sale (or donation?)
STRATEGIES:
Plant sedge-grass for carbon-credit offset.
Rules should include not buying carbon credits, has to be direct action.
Direct action can include educational campaigns, with some percentage of the effects of the educational campaign scored against the team.
Note that final teams will probably all have NEGATIVE scores.
PS:
If someone runs with this before I get it together, more power to you. But you should still use bountyup.com for the prize
Blogged with Flock
Checkmate? MySpace, Bebo and SixApart To Join Google OpenSocial (confirmed)
Posted by admin in entrepreneurs on 01Nov07
There’s nothing like twitter to bring home the reality that, at least when it comes to news, traditional search engines are horribly obsolete. Having heard about this from @Scobleizer, I immediately checked google.com, news.google.com, even the myspace homepage. Nothing.
Google may have just come out of nowhere and checkmated Facebook in the social networking power struggle.MySpace and Six Apart will announce that they are joining Google’s OpenSocial initiative.
Checkmate? MySpace, Bebo and SixApart To Join Google OpenSocial (confirmed)
Ironically, this may be the boost that OpenID (or some better system) needs – as per my previous post on Identitu.de, a cross-site API for developers immediately raises the ugly questions of duplicate accounts, and the merging and splitting required.
Hopefully there’s a better way than what I’ve been doing on the Facebook Platform – silently creating a new BountyUp user to match the Facebook user ID.
Blogged with Flock
If it’s revolutionary, it’s probably confusing
Posted by admin in entrepreneurs on 31Oct07
The reason, I think, that the history of human development has been one of evolution, and not revolution, is simple: anything radically new, is by definition hard to explain. That’s because it lacks context – there’s nothing else quite like it. Explanations are easiest by comparison.
And so we compare the revolutionary to the soup de’ jour, and the explanation dumbs our revolution down – a little bit each time, until we reach that magical threshold where it’s no longer indigestible, because the tide in the sea of collective understanding has come in.
Great Ecommerce in 3 Easy Steps – Step One, The Pig.
Posted by admin in entrepreneurs on 27Aug07

I’ve put some of the mockups for the new BountyUp website onto my flickr account, and it’s really starting to look good. Bruce Giovando, of voleurz fame, has a particular knack for design akin to fungus.
What I mean by that is that it’s in soft, earthy tones, and that although you might be initially repelled by it, gradually it grows on you. This is especially true of the “pig”:
I’m hoping that this cute, lovable, and strangely rotund mascot will help people overcome their initial cognitive friction, and get around to really getting their mind around this whole “social buying” thing.
Expect to see the new design up on the site within the week. Other features in production include:
* Templates for common bounty terms
* More and better social features (wall posts, friends)
* Favorite Bounties
* New and different payment methods (goodbye, Paypal)
The Tag Tree – my crazy plan
Posted by admin in entrepreneurs on 14Apr07
This will be the first in probably an expanding set of blog posts detailing my crazy ideas for various kinds of technical hackery – this way, if I don’t get around to building it, at least I can claim that I had the idea first.
Tag-tree: What and Why:
* Bountyup.com (see my crazy startup blog thread, soon to be written) uses the now-ever-popular tagging metaphor for classification of items. However, I *still* want to be able to pretend to have a traditional taxonomy on the front page, represented as a tree (roughly speaking). Rather than build one and manually classify all bounties, or (even worse) force the *users* to classify them, I have a few choices:
a) Map tags to categories in some one-to-many or combined-key-to-many sort of way
b) Show every tag as a single flat category
c) Make a tree out of the tags
I’ve decided to try and do the latter (yes, I realize this is one of those impossible web2.0-type dreams, since by their very nature folksonomies and taxonomies are different beast. I’m going to try anyway, and at the very least this will give me a starting point for (a) above).
My proposed algorithm:
1. Most commonly used tags become the top-level folders.
2. Tags used in conjunction become secondary folders.
3. Items tagged with a secondary tag and no primary tag will be disambiguated, if possible, by the following steps:
a. If other items have been tagged by the same user with this secondary tag, as well as a primary tag, the matching primary tag will be assumed.
b. If not, (eventually) content analysis will be used to disambiguate (full-text index of other secondary-tagged content to determine the appropriate primary tag).
c. In the meantime, show the item in both locations, and possibly flag for manual review. (Maybe a cool tag-supporting UI that suggests possible primary tags to a secondary tag?)
Drawbacks, Advantages, and other Characteristics of the Approach:
* The hierarchy will constantly be shifting, since a secondary tag will become a primary tag simply by becoming more frequently used than the primary.
* Perhaps this should start out as an advanced or even admin-only view of the data?
* It’s possible (likely?) that there will end up with either a.) thousands of primary tags, or b.) thousands of ambiguated items with only secondary tags.
Let’s see how it goes.
Blogged with Flock
