Comments on: Why Microsoft is Evil (and Google is Not) http://www.cognition.ca/2009/02/why-microsoft-is-evil-and-google-is-not.html Balls-in-the-air Entrepreneurship and Juggling. Sat, 04 Feb 2012 22:36:22 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1 By: Robert Wooller http://www.cognition.ca/2009/02/why-microsoft-is-evil-and-google-is-not.html/comment-page-1#comment-657 Robert Wooller Mon, 19 Jul 2010 21:22:18 +0000 http://www.cognition.ca/?p=145#comment-657 The greed at Google is obscene. Originally created as an academic tool in 1996/7 Google has totally sold out to greed, Larry Page and Sergey Brin are totally greedy. I think a $40bn payout is obscene. I mean is there any need for that much money? In the future there will only be one provider Wal-Mart Google. The greed at Google is obscene. Originally created as an academic tool in 1996/7 Google has totally sold out to greed, Larry Page and Sergey Brin are totally greedy. I think a $40bn payout is obscene. I mean is there any need for that much money? In the future there will only be one provider Wal-Mart Google.

]]> By: Robert Wooller http://www.cognition.ca/2009/02/why-microsoft-is-evil-and-google-is-not.html/comment-page-1#comment-656 Robert Wooller Mon, 19 Jul 2010 21:12:43 +0000 http://www.cognition.ca/?p=145#comment-656 Google is obviously just as bad as Microsoft, and I think after Sergey Brin and Larry Page get a payout of nearly $40bn, the greed at Google is obscene. So the argument is over about Google. In the future we will only get everything from one source Walmart Google, inc. Google is obviously just as bad as Microsoft, and I think after Sergey Brin and Larry Page get a payout of nearly $40bn, the greed at Google is obscene. So the argument is over about Google. In the future we will only get everything from one source Walmart Google, inc.

]]> By: admin http://www.cognition.ca/2009/02/why-microsoft-is-evil-and-google-is-not.html/comment-page-1#comment-411 admin Sun, 15 Feb 2009 04:35:04 +0000 http://www.cognition.ca/?p=145#comment-411 Doug - Both are true, I think. But there's a difference between social efficiency and business efficiency. Government handouts and deferred taxes are efficient for business, but socially inefficient. Why not simply give the same money to the CONSUMERS - as an incentive to buy the cars that Ford and GM now promise to make fuel-efficient? Doug – Both are true, I think. But there’s a difference between social efficiency and business efficiency. Government handouts and deferred taxes are efficient for business, but socially inefficient.

Why not simply give the same money to the CONSUMERS – as an incentive to buy the cars that Ford and GM now promise to make fuel-efficient?

]]> By: Doug Ransom http://www.cognition.ca/2009/02/why-microsoft-is-evil-and-google-is-not.html/comment-page-1#comment-410 Doug Ransom Sat, 14 Feb 2009 14:53:52 +0000 http://www.cognition.ca/?p=145#comment-410 "in a world so backwards we’re giving money away to the producers of the most inefficient vehicles on the planet" could read "in a world so backwards we’re giving money away to the most inefficient producers of vehicles on the planet ... " “in a world so backwards we’re giving money away to the producers of the most inefficient vehicles on the planet”

could read

“in a world so backwards we’re giving money away to the most inefficient producers of vehicles on the planet … “

]]>