Archive for January, 2008

How-To Change Your Life: 11 Steps to Carbon Neutral

No, it’s not about your lightbulbs. It’s in your head.

Diaper ChangeA lot of the emphasis in my childhood was on being responsible for yourself – not simply in the sense of providing for your own needs, but actually taking responsibility for who you are, and how you behave. The obvious corollary was learning how to change. Contrary to popular belief, it’s not impossible. Nor is it magical, mysterious, or something involving $300 /hr therapists. But it does take work – and a bit of know-how.

My father explained it to me quite succinctly, when I was around 17 and I decided that I needed to start putting my laundry away, rather than leaving it in a stack on the dresser (which quickly became a heap on the floor.)

  1. Build up some momentum by changing a few simple, easy things. This can get you into a habit of winning at change. (For instance, every time I wanted to do this I would switch to brushing my teeth with my left hand. It’s easy to remember, and a great daily sticking point).
  2. Then WAIT to start on your change until you’re ready to WIN. It’s more important to do it right once, than it is to do it right now.
  3. Find something that you can do every day, even if you’re changing how you react to an annual event (like thanksgiving with the inlaws). It will give you a chance to invest additional energy and attention on your decision.
  4. If you get through the first week without missing a day, you’ve got a beachhead. Making it through the first month gets you most of the way there. After that, it’s all about the rest of your life. Read the rest of this entry »

, , , , ,

9 Comments

How to Win the War – Personifying the “Enemy” of Carbon Output

I’ve been reading “Confessions of an Economic Hitman” recently. Great book, on a topic that I’m personally passionate about (the corporate manipulation of developing nations for political and economic gain). I’ll probably recommend it to a bunch of friends. And then what?

The sad fact is, we’re hardwired to deal with emergencies. We’re biologically programmed to run from tigers. But when it comes to slow-moving, inexorably advancing walls of ice (like heart disease, greenhouse gases or even obesity), we’re basically useless.

Why? Because they don’t have a face. Read the rest of this entry »

, , , , ,

1 Comment

Raising Money – The Second Time

“Going for broke.”

Homeless manWhen it comes to entrepreneurship, there are several truisms that immediately jump out at you -

  • Most (almost all) entrepreneurs fail the first time.
  • Many of them fail the second or third time as well.
  • The winners are the ones who kept going.

Coupled with the fact that almost all businesses, large or small, start out with capital raised from friends and family, and you end up with an interesting dilemma – how do you raise money the second time?

I can answer this from a couple of perspectives, the first being my own. Depending on how you count things, this is probably my third startup. The first, known only by the quizzical nomenclature of 6169171, was an amazing flameout. The second, NaTel Communications, Inc., I’m in the middle of selling off – for something very close to liquidation value.

At the height of our hubris in the 616 days, we raised $120K in a little less than 6 weeks. Couple that with in-house money (about $50K), and three of us working largely unpaid for almost a year, and the total business loss was easily $250K – which I gather is typical of a tech-company flameout.

What happened?

Pretty much everything you can imagine.

  • Our financial consultant turned out to be wanted by the FBI for fraud.
  • Our first major partners ended up disclosing (after signing a contract, mind you) that they were already in partnership with LG Electronics, and wouldn’t break the contract unless we provided them with $60K per month in operating capital. We didn’t even have the budget to sue them.
  • Our CFO ran off with our business plan and second major partnership, and set up a directly competing business.
  • Our accountant, although brilliant, disappeared for months at a time, and never finished the asset restatement. (Mind you, we never got a bill, either).

The final nail in the coffin was when our primary competitor filed something very close to a carbon copy of our financing application, and received several million dollars in government-backed loans – which disqualified our application before it was even submitted.Backing up from the specifics, though – what went wrong?

  • The deal was too big. Three-corner deals can be amazingly powerful, but expect 6-12 months to close them, and a failure rate 3 times normal.
  • The initial financing was too small. We ran out of money every 60 days, and had to stop work while we raised more. Since we never raised enough, each cycle got harder to close, as investor confidence fell.
  • We didn’t have the right team – it was geographically distributed, and we didn’t know each other well enough going in.

When I moved past this project, and started trying to move NaTel Communications, Inc. forward, I took a slightly different approach – I brought in a single “business partner”, who brought both money, and active participation. (While we tried to do that with 616, the partner we brought in there turned out to have neither money, or skills.)

There are problems with this approach – most of them revolve around the friction developed in a business environment where one of several “equal” partners has the final word on how every dollar gets spent. Opportunity cost is a bitch.

So what now?

Now I’m back at a startup with a way more exciting opportunity, and some major differences:

  • BountyUp.com already has revenue (albeit small).
  • It’s growing, and doesn’t need $billions to do so.
  • I’m working on a project that I’m excited about.
  • Outside of the business idea, we’re not getting creative – all the fundamentals (business model, financing, technology) are proven, long-term, industry standards.

Is this enough to convince would-be friends-and-family-investors to take a second chance, or will the adage of “Once burned, twice shy” hold true? I’ll let you know in a few weeks.

Some other things I’ve done:

  • Paid it back. To date, I’ve paid back close to $20K of the initial outside investments into 616. While a long way from the total amount, I’ve made sure to pay back those who could least afford to lose it, first. (And yes, that’s out of my own pocket.)
  • Told the truth. (Even about the embarrassing things, like getting suckered by a Florida financing con-man).
  • Put more of my own “skin in the game”. Last time round, I was nearly flat broke myself, and tried to make up for my small financial contribution by working, literally, 16-20 hours a day. For a YEAR. In retrospect, this was bad for the business, and led to other mistakes, which compounded themselves.
  • Focused on the product first, and the financing second.

Now it’s your turn to tell your story – what did you do to raise money? What did you do when you failed? Who came back for a second try?

, , ,

No Comments

An honest politician?

The good folk of Jefferson County, Iowa let us know how they won the primary for their county. This should be the “National Ron Paul Grassroots Playbook” – and best of all, it’s featuring one of my very best friends (and co-founder of BountyUp), Samara Burnes. Mind you, I spent 3 years living in Jefferson County, Iowa, and I can tell you it’s not really like anywhere else on the planet.It may be one of those places where honesty and principles still go over in politics.

read more | digg story

,

1 Comment

Thought-experiment: Bicycle-powered Heat Pump?

My furnace is just about shot.

It’s a 70s-era oil furnace that came with the house. It smells funny, it sucks oil down like a breast-fed three-year-old, and it’s burning a serious hole in my pocket.

Since I’ve got to do something about it, I figured I’d go one step better than a simple upgrade, and put in a heat pump. Heat pumps are one of the coolest things invented in the last few centuries. (My own personal standard of coolness is the bicycle, which I consider to be the closest man has come so far to a perfect machine, with the exception of the friction brakes. All braking should be energy recapture.)

When I realized that a heat pump is effectively 200-300% efficient (compared to production of heat), I started to wonder if it could be made even more environmentally friendly by doing away with the electrical motor entirely. A little research uncovered gas-engine-powered heat pumps, but I wanted to go even farther – bicycle power.

The most popular consumer-grade bicycle generator outputs around 200 watts of electricity. If I assume that the generator efficiency is around 60% (based on data on wikipedia), and we use direct-drive of the compressor, then effective power output of the cyclist is about 330 watts.

If I was REALLY hard-core, I can imagine bicycling 2 hours, every day, for a total power generation of:

330 watts * 2 hours * 365 days = 240 kWh per year.

A two-ton heat pump from Goodman (the SSZ16, for those of you following along from home) draws 1.7 kW at 47 degrees F (the typical measurement point). If, theoretically, a one-ton unit drew only half that (it doesn’t), and we took some advantage (not much) from avoiding the electric motor and using direct drive from the bicycle, we *might* be able, with two cyclists, to run a heat pump in real time.

Wow. For a near-perfect machine, that’s a lot of wasted power.

In an upcoming post, I’ll be looking into ways we can establish a mental framework for evaluating our energy usage, and other aspects of our “inconvenience“.

, , , , ,

7 Comments

Close
E-mail It