Archive for December, 2007
The seduction of Browser Hacking
Posted by admin in entrepreneurs on December 28th, 2007
I’ve just spent another day in the Flock office. It’s like an addiction – browser coding is the opium of hacker drugs. Why?
- It’s really hard (cross-platform, mixed languages, and inherent complexity).
- Millions of people will use the result (at least, until they turn off Netscape).
- It’s not that hard to innovate.
Now, I imagine there are legions of Mozilla folks arguing with me on that last point, but if you look at this essay on browser featuresets, we’re essentially still living in the 90s – most of what most people need to do, most of the time, is still difficult, and poorly exposed.
Think I’m being harsh? Okay, try signing up for a new service with your browser – say, Firefox. Did you get this great dialog?

Why would you do this to someone??
How bout this for an approach instead:
– We have just saved your password. <Undo that> <Undo, and Don’t ever do that>
In a browser bar – non-interruptive, and it’s already done the best thing. (Of course, this is predicated on having a “public” mode in the browser, or a “logged in” mode – wait, didn’t we have that in NS6?)
Anyway, I (of course) have been dreaming of the super browser since just before we started work on Netscape 8 (which was originally going to be NS 10 – ask me about that sometime). The one that *I* would want to use. The one that I quit my job at Mercurial to join Flock and build.
If I was business savvy, I would build the ElderBrowser. I know – I coined the term, at Gnomedex ‘07. (And damn their shitty network connection, too – it died in the middle of my attempts to register the domain, and GoDaddy scooped it from me.) Talk about an unserved market. But honestly – it’s not really the browser that I want to build.
What does that browser look like? I’ve got 20 pages of notes. Perhaps I’ll put them up here. Would you use it?
StomperNet Scrutinizer: My new favorite web dev tool
Posted by admin in Uncategorized on December 27th, 2007

The idea is simple, yet powerful – simulate eye-motion tracking by blurring an entire webpage, save for a small elliptical region (the fovial view).
It forces you to think about web design from the ultimate usability bias – and I think that’s a good thing.
StomperNet Scrutinizer: Get Your Click Fu | StomperNet.com
Blogged with Flock
Tags: browser, tools, scrutinizer, bountyup
Why entrepreneurs need to learn how to juggle – literally
Posted by admin in entrepreneurs on December 24th, 2007
I started juggling when I was seven years old – first a few lacrosse balls, then pins, rings, torches, and finally companies. It’s an old truism among jugglers that learning to juggle will help managers become better at everything else they do – but I think it’s especially true for entrepreneurs. Here’s why:
1. The Nature of Juggling:
Juggling is, quite simply, not dropping the ball. If you take any task (marketing, engineering, testing, etc) and think of it as a ball that has to be moved forward, then you have a few options: You can push it along yourself (“moving the ball forward”), or you can toss it.
I like to think of “tossing the ball” as being planning and delegation – get it pointed in the right direction (planning), and give it enough force to carry it as far as it needs to go (delegate), before you’re going to catch it again (reporting loop).
Now let me point out a few things about REAL juggling:
Tossing and catching one ball at a time is a walk in the park – so easy, even most executives can handle it. Two balls is only slightly more interesting. When you hit three, all of a sudden you’ve got more balls, than you do hands. This is true juggling. Here are the tricks:
- Ignore the catches. If you have to be paying attention to catch a ball that’s in your field of vision, you need to put two balls back down and polish your skills. If you’re struggling to catch wide-flying balls, you can’t fix that with the catch. You’ve got to put your attention back on the throws.
- Ignore the throws. I know, I just told you to put your attention on them. But I was oversimplifying, just slightly. In point of fact, it’s impossible to change your throw by thinking about it – just like you don’t change your golf swing by thinking about the muscles in your calf. You just think about where you want to put the club. The same thing is true in juggling – just think about where you want the ball to go, and then let your arms do the work.
- Ignore the balls. You actually can’t do this on purpose, but when you get to the space where you “wake up” from juggling, and realize that your body has been doing all the work, with no extra help from you, well… professional athletes call this the “zone”, and they spend huge amounts of time and energy trying to get there. I don’t know of an easier way to do it than with juggling, and you’ll find yourself refreshed and ready to take on nearly anything.
The process of LEARNING to juggle is a lot like entrepreneurship, as well:
- You can practice with one or two balls all you want, but you can’t really learn to juggle without going for it – and dropping things.
- Each ball added makes things MUCH more difficult. Most folks (yes, even executives and MBAs) can be taught how to juggle three balls in just a couple of days. Learning a four-ball pattern takes, perhaps, a few months. Five balls usually takes YEARS, and represents a serious commitment. And only a few hundred people in the world can juggle seven.
- If you find yourself chasing the balls, i.e. walking or running around the room with each ball a little farther forward, then you’re already lost, and the balls are coming down. Better to catch them now, clean up your pattern and relaunch.
Some advanced tips for more extreme jugglers:
- Dropping a ball in 3-ball juggling is, generally speaking, game over. However, when you’re working with 4- or 5-ball patterns, you can simply “reduce your scope” while you work to get the dropped ball back up in the air. It’s HARD, and usually will involve dropping a few more until you’re practiced. Again, the best approach may be to catch everything and relaunch.
- If the balls aren’t all the same weight, you’re going to have problems. Perhaps you need to find another juggler and trade across until you’ve got a balanced set.
- Rhythm and pace are critical – there’s a natural speed to juggling, and the balls all need to move at the same speed. There’s no way to juggle with one ball being thrown twice as high as all the others, unless you’re practicing “shape distortion”. And the “right speed” to juggle at is a fact of your height, your skill-level, and the length of your arms. As long as you can keep the balls up in the air, don’t let anyone tell you to go faster.
Obviously I’m leaving it up to you to draw the parallels between juggling, and entrepreneurship. But trust me, they’re there. And I’ll leave you with one other thought:
- When you’re learning to juggle, always practice with your off hand. (The left hand for right-handed people, the right hand for left-handed folks). Here’s why: if you learn how to do something (be it a simple toss or catch, or something more complex like a blindfolded penguin toss), with your off hand, you will automatically be able to do the same thing, with your dominant hand. But if you learn it with your dominant hand first, you’ll have to learn it all over again with your off hand.
Seth’s Blog: …and your clicks for free (the new ebook)
Posted by admin in entrepreneurs on December 20th, 2007

I’m struggling right now to come up with the ultimate unified theory of business, that somehow captures the wisdom of Seth Godin, Guy Kawasaki, Robert Allen, and Christopher Alexander. (It’s no surprise that you probably know either one, or two, of those names, but unlikely three and very unlikely all four – but it’s a toss-up which ones.)
Maybe Seth’s latest thoughts will help to clarify things:
Seth’s Blog: …and your clicks for free (the new ebook)
The real challenge is not unifying the theories and advice of those separate authors, but simply the fact that their ideas aren’t even INTERNALLY consistent. Should I “Don’t worry, be crappy” while bootstrapping (read: starving) myself into a niche? Alright: name three of the biggest internet businesses ever. Are eBay, Amazon, Yahoo, or Google on that list? What sort of niche do you think they went for?
Blogged with Flock
Tags: sethgodin, guy kawasaki, blog marketing, bootstrapping
A quick idea for Google
Posted by admin in entrepreneurs on December 13th, 2007
I have categorically refused to build a web business based on advertising revenue. Eventually I had to ask myself “why”, and this is what I came up with – I find advertising repugnant, EXCEPT when it’s about something I want.
A little light went off in my head – I know how to hack google adsense to display ads based on a given keyword. I know how to use greasemonkey to edit the pages I’m browsing. And I know how to get my recent search history out of google. Why not combine these – a greasemonkey script that rewrites google adsense to be ads for products matching my recent search history? It could even be customized with a keyword list of my own devising.
I can’t imagine google would object – the ads will still be there, they’ll just be better.
Thoughts?
When it’s not about the gifts, what is it about?
Posted by admin in Uncategorized on December 7th, 2007
A very straightforward, honest proposal for a simple holiday season, from a mother of small children. Five non-commercial ways to celebrate the Season, packed to the linefeeds with suggestions, recipes, and handy insights.
read more | digg story
Google Chart API
Posted by admin in entrepreneurs on December 7th, 2007

Just released by google is this really cool RESTian image-generator for on-the-fly data visualization. Maybe not as cool as VisitorVille, with animated buses representing incoming visitors, but still really neat. I see a lot of hosted websites with no GD support using this.
Blogged with Flock
C.I.A. Destroyed Tapes of Interrogations – New York Times
Posted by admin in entrepreneurs on December 7th, 2007
The videotapes showed agency operatives in 2002 subjecting terror suspects — including Abu Zubaydah, the first detainee in C.I.A. custody — to severe interrogation techniques. They were destroyed in part because officers were concerned that tapes documenting controversial interrogation methods could expose agency officials to greater risk of legal jeopardy, several officials said.
The recordings were not provided to a federal court hearing the case of the terror suspect Zacarias Moussaoui or to the Sept. 11 commission, which had made formal requests to the C.I.A. for transcripts and any other documentary evidence taken from interrogations of agency prisoners. C.I.A. lawyers told federal prosecutors in 2003 and 2005, who relayed the information to a federal court in the Moussaoui case, that the C.I.A. did not possess recordings of interrogations sought by the judge in the case.
I have only two questions:
1. What is the difference between “Severe Interrogation Techniques”, and Torture?
2. If the CIA doesn’t report to Congress, who do they report to?
C.I.A. Destroyed Tapes of Interrogations – New York Times
Blogged with Flock
Inconvenience – Life Racing to Zero Impact
The Concept:

Take the basic ideas (problem description) from “An Inconvenient Truth”.
Create a regional contest (bounty) for teams with the lowest global impact (average per person on the team) over 6 months. Global Impact is measured and documented as:
- Carbon output
- Non-renewables consumed
- Average distance food travels (aka carbon output in transport)
- Social impact (Average wage in USD of all workers in the supply chain of all goods and services consumed)
Obviously need a good baseline and some rough approximations.
Contests are regional in scope (e.g., Inconvenience Vancouver Island, Inconvenience Chicago, etc).
Teams can seek local or international corporate sponsors as appropriate to their plan (BC Hydro for a team looking mostly at electrical reduction, etc.)
Teams are responsible for documenting their score (photographic evidence of bicycle transport, power bills, etc.)
Make a reality TV show around it.
Host a massive awards ceremony with Celebrity MCs.
Kick it off with a rock concert, bring the teams up on stage in between acts.
If we can figure out a way to generate a handicap for each region (based on climate, available options, etc.) then we could play regional champions against each other.
THE NAME:
Obviously a not-subtle reference to the film, it also highlights that it is, at most, an “Inconvenience” to change your lifestyle to save the planet, and by extension, humanity.
It’s verbable.
It can be abbreviated to iCon, which also has interesting connotations as being a symbol of something bigger.
The domain name is parked and possibly for sale (or donation?)
STRATEGIES:
Plant sedge-grass for carbon-credit offset.
Rules should include not buying carbon credits, has to be direct action.
Direct action can include educational campaigns, with some percentage of the effects of the educational campaign scored against the team.
Note that final teams will probably all have NEGATIVE scores.
PS:
If someone runs with this before I get it together, more power to you. But you should still use bountyup.com for the prize
Blogged with Flock

